<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash for Clunkers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billgray.us/cash-for-clunkers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billgray.us/cash-for-clunkers/</link>
	<description>and my observations of connectedness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karenc</title>
		<link>http://billgray.us/cash-for-clunkers/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>karenc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billgray.us/?p=77#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Cash for Clunkers  has another negative consequence. It will harm donations of car to charity because the voucher is much greater than the tax deduction for donating a car. Congress could have stimulated car sales by just returning to allowing car donors to claim the book value as their tax deduction. Since most donated cars are recycled, there would be an environmental benefit as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cash for Clunkers  has another negative consequence. It will harm donations of car to charity because the voucher is much greater than the tax deduction for donating a car. Congress could have stimulated car sales by just returning to allowing car donors to claim the book value as their tax deduction. Since most donated cars are recycled, there would be an environmental benefit as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

